CLOSE
23 July 2021| Golden Chariot Recreations Pvt. Ltd. v. Mukesh Panika & others | Arb. Pet. 593 of 2020 | Sanjeev Narula J | 2021 SCC OnLine Del
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Section 11 ACA because it was filed beyond three years. The court said that the period of three years under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 started to run 30 days from the receipt by the respondent of the notice of arbitration.
A co-ordinate bench had already rejected a prior petition for appointment on the same ground. The second petition was based on the argument that there was a fresh cause of action because another notice of arbitration had been sent regarding the actual sale of a property as opposed to an attempt to sell earlier. Narula J noted that the distinction between the so-called causes of action was illusionary and superficial.
The reader would benefit by noting here the following points on the structure of Section 11 ACA: